Language Diversity and Learning
In the reading about language
diversity, Lisa Delpit provides the reader with a vignette of what an
elementary school teacher experienced when she used a different code or variety
of the English language in her new classroom with a student who had prior
experience with her instruction. The beauty of young children is that they have
no filter. They speak what they are thinking and surely enough, the student called
her out for switching it up. This is something I constantly reflect on because
I catch myself slipping from very formal, academic language to everyday
friendly banter with my students on a daily basis. None of them have ever
commented on it and I justify it as a means of keeping them engaged and alert.
However, I am worried that I may be sacrificing exposure to an alternative,
more academic form, when I do this. One of the suggestions made in the paper
was to record myself teaching so that I can focus in on the vocabulary that I
am using, more specifically when I am questioning the students.
This brings
me to my other source of anxiety. My questioning style. It is something I am
constantly working on because in my high paced classroom, there isn’t much time
to dig deeper or provide students with the appropriate waiting time to respond
to my questions. One way I’ve tried to circumvent this area of weakness is by
starting my classes off with a warm-up question that is higher up in Bloom’s taxonomy
than perhaps the type I ask as I’m zooming along. The warm-ups are done in
writing and answers are shared out in a huddle after the first five minutes of
class. They frequently have to do with something that ties the previous days
lesson with the current lesson and therefore require students to go out on a
limb to try and answer them. This means that I constantly remind them that
there is no right or wrong answer. I am looking for critical thinking. In my
search for examples of good questioning versus not so great ones, I came across
a Ted Talk video where Joe Burgum, a dyslexic learner, shares his experience in
the classroom and his realization that “a good question often leads to new
collaboration and a great question is often the predecessor to a brilliant idea”. Thats what I would like to achieve in my classroom because in science, the right questions lead to the best inquiry based learning.
Thanks for your post Brigette. In the case of your first concern--switching between formal academic language and friendly banter, it sounds like this practice may be an asset for your students, modeling different ways of using language for different purposes. You might even call this out and invite a short discussion about it--this kind of metacognitive practice helps students recognize and analyze the way language is being used.
ReplyDeleteBest
Victoria
Hi Brigette!
ReplyDeleteLike you, I find that I change my vocabulary from academic language to more social language. I do this because I am trying to relate to my students and find common ground. But, you're right... am I sacrificing exposing them to higher level vocabulary needed for high education?? I don't know, because I want them to understand the concepts, not always the fancy vocabulary, especially in chemistry when the vocabulary is difficult. For instance, stiochiometry, which is a complex way of saying ratios and conversions. I struggle with this idea too, maybe we can chat about it and find a solution! Thank you for sharing your thoughts!
Best,
Ellie